|
|
|
|
|
by _jcwu
2666 days ago
|
|
>This policy of allowing dog is pushed by a majority that cannot understand that some of us simply don't like dogs at all. Should we also ban roses, because some people don't like them? How about no meat at the workplace because it could bother vegans? There has to be some kind of compromise by everyone if people want to share a place. Be it accepting that some people love dogs, hate roses,.... At the end, if the majority likes something, you are on the losing end in a shared environment at least (as bad as that sounds). One could also argue it is rather selfish that you want a shared environment to suit your needs only. If something bothers you that much then you have to somehow find a compromise. Maybe you can sit away from the dog owner coworkers or something or create "dog areas" and "no-dog areas." (Another compromise, like I mentioned). |
|
If roses moved around, barked, and pooped on the floor, then hell yeah. Otherwise, that analogy sucks.