|
|
|
|
|
|
by thisisweirdok
2661 days ago
|
|
|
>As well as paying for the burden of the corruption involved in Bostonian construction projects that (at least) doubled the cost of what it should have gone for Is there evidence of this? Everyone says it but it always seems extreme (Seriously? $11bn to corruption?). I think there's credence to the fact that these projects often go to the lowest bidders, and in this instance there was a lot of rework done to compensate for cheap materials and poor workmanship. >you and your people compel others to bear the burden of your personal value choices New Hampshire is an hour away if you don't want a tax-supported public infrastructure. |
|
|