He also encourages students to make a pull requests when they find errata.
I can see the argument that this
"open sources" the literature and brings students closer to it.
However - students are not experts in the subject matter and this makes for anxiety-inducing and frankly ineffective pedagogy. You are there to learn, but never know if the proof you are reading is correct or not. The errors get in the way.
I can see the argument that this "open sources" the literature and brings students closer to it.
However - students are not experts in the subject matter and this makes for anxiety-inducing and frankly ineffective pedagogy. You are there to learn, but never know if the proof you are reading is correct or not. The errors get in the way.