Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by woodrowbarlow 2667 days ago
that's disappointing. i was also hoping to see books that have commonly-used nicknames, like "the dragon book", get counted.
2 comments

I was unable to determine what you mean by “the dragon book”. Is that related to the recent Dragon movie that was in the Oscars? I don’t imagine you mean The Magicians book 2. Maybe you mean “Girl with the Dragon Tattoo” (terrific dragon on the cover!) but I’m honestly not really sure what you mean otherwise :(

While you could answer my above questions directly, I don’t need them answered; I’m just trying to make the point that “nicknames” cannot be easily correlated with a book when you scale up to “the entire word of readers”.

He almost surely means Compilers: Principles, Techniques, and Tools by Alfred V. Aho, Monica S. Lam, Ravi Sethi, and Jeffrey D. Ullman [1]... or one of the earlier versions of the book with different authors and titles ;-).

As was common for 80s software textbooks, this was nicknamed for the distinctive image on the cover.

But (and now your edit clarifies that this indeed was your point), perhaps your point is just how difficult it would be to automatically disambiguate nicknames in diverse communities like StackExchange.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compilers:_Principles,_Techniq...

Google manages to scale up fine in this case -- searching for 'the dragon book' gives the correct answer as its first hit (via wikipedia)...
well, this is difficult to do ... We will need to create a nickname dictionary for all books in the first place, right?