Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by warkdarrior 2672 days ago
From a security perspective, it is better to have the endpoints just share the session secret with a DPI box, instead of running the DPI software on the endpoint.

If the endpoint in compromised, in the first scenario, the most the attacker can do it not share the session secret. This is easily detectable.

In the second scenario, the attacker can pretend that the endpoint-local DPI software is still being run, while completely going around it.

1 comments

Sorry if my point wasn't clear. I do mean that there should be DPI software running somewhere external, the point is just that you don't need dedicated hardware to do it. I completely agree doing everything on the endpoint isn't going to end well.