[DannyB2]

Clojure and Clojurescript DO have access to a lot of the same libraries.

There are also conditional reader constructs so that a library can, when necessary, offer different implementation details between Clojure and Clojurescript.

Ignoring libraries completely, Hy doesn't have the most important things that set Clojure apart. (As another poster points out.) Especially immutability.

This is nothing against Hy. I'm sure I would like it when I want a Lisp in a Python environment. But there's no good reason, and it is even misleading, to try to conflate it with clojure. It seems like it stands on its own strengths well enough.