|
|
|
|
|
|
by kbody
2664 days ago
|
|
|
It misrepresents the point of the actual author, the author focuses on everything other than the lack of transactions with crypto. The focus on the number was given by the submitter. If the case is valid for the rule, motives or biases like mine, yours or anyone's are irrelevant. |
|
|
It doesn't? The moral of the story is bitcoin hasn't been adopted as much as the bitcoin fanboys will scream.