|
|
|
|
|
by johnisgood
2673 days ago
|
|
I tested the code. It compiles and runs just fine. I compared the checksum of the output from both Rust and this version, they are identical: md5 5b185f9a67a426baf78aa3bbb5baf8df out_rust md5 5b185f9a67a426baf78aa3bbb5baf8df out_ada On top of that, I got this: Rust: real 0m0.702s user 0m0.693s sys 0m0.007s Ada: real 0m0.708s user 0m0.706s sys 0m0.000s Why don't you use this version instead? The output is correct and identical to Rust's, and the performance is significantly better: just as fast as C and Rust, as expected. Thanks for letting us know about its existence! |
|
Edit: I do not understand your reaction to me thanking you for bringing my (and possibly other people's) attention to the other implementation. It was genuine.
> You're reading-between-the-lines something that isn't there.
Okay, my mistake then. :)