Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by leereeves 2666 days ago
The example shows that the same words could have defended those unconscionable conditions from 1911, which were also legal at the time.

Can you come up with a reason workers shouldn't fight back against RevolutApp's demands that wouldn't also apply to the horrible conditions in 1911?
1 comments
chrismeller 2666 days ago
I never said workers who didn’t like it shouldn’t. If you don’t like it you absolutely could and should.

If you reread my comment I specifically said that some people do like it at certain points in their lives. Let them decide if the job is for them...

link
leereeves 2666 days ago
RevolutApp is small enough (for now) that working there might seem optional. But working is not optional, and if employers are able to impose conditions like these, they're all going to want to.

Would you feel the same way if a company with 100,000 employees made these demands? If hundreds of companies with millions of employees total did so?

link
gspetr 2666 days ago
> But working is not optional

I know people who've been on welfare for generations, having never worked a day in their lives.

link