|
|
|
|
|
|
by int_19h
2674 days ago
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure OP meant to write "idiomatic C++ does not bounds check". That's certainly true - the only place I've ever seen at() in use is in textbooks, never in production code. It doesn't really make much sense, because the moment you start using iterators, it's all unchecked anyway, so why bother with at() specifically? |
|
|