|
|
|
|
|
by jeff95350
5684 days ago
|
|
"You would risk being accused of cheating [if you informed the teacher that you had special access]." The epitome of rationalization. Academic honesty is taken seriously, and there are third parties that evaluate the situation objectively. If you simply say, "I didn't do anything that I thought of as cheating, but today on test day I realized that I had an advantage that I wanted to inform you about," there is zero chance of permanent consequences. "So instead somebody did it anonymously." Why didn't everyone then? Maybe those few people are honest, or some approximation thereof. But what about the other ~190 that didn't? |
|
>... there is zero chance of permanent consequences.
Bull. Faculty are just as petty and lazy (ie: human) as any other person. There are plenty of instances of teachers saving their own asses by lying enough to get away with it, and with them wielding their mighty tenure in unethical ways.
Damned if you do, damned if you don't, if you don't know the teacher very well. Odds are certainly on your side, heavily even, but it's far from "zero".