Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by somacert 2669 days ago
Making optical grade ice is not trivial. Not hard but I never did get good results.

Start with good water.

Freeze in a gradient(top down is easiest) half of your ice will still be garbage.

Explicitly: by gradient I mean put it in an insulated container so that it freezes starting at the top and ending at the bottom.

3 comments

BTW, this reminds me of an easy way to make a GRIN lens: http://www.laurawaller.com/opticsfun/sugarGRINlens.htm
That's neat; a friend of mine made a GRIN lens by letting gelatin set in a cup on a turntable; the density increased with the radius so it acted as a concave lens despite being disc shaped.
Why is top down easier? I have a few "neat ice kit" which does that for ice cubes for drinking, but the results are very mixed.

I've always wondered why it's a top down design instead of a bottom up? It seems to me like if you were to freeze a container bottom up, the impurities would be pushed out towards the top, and eventually out of the water into the air above, instead of making bulging shapes as ice expands and wasting half your ice with trapped impurities.

I should test the theory later at home.

Mainly mechanical

Top down you can put the the water in a small ice chest and the insulation will slow the freeze in the bulk. otherwise it freezes outside in

That ice floats may play some role, I am not sure if for or against.

I made a couple of attempts, just for fun, and found the ice chest necessary but never made a systematic study of the process.

I'd suggest that heating the water first would be a good idea. Heating water gets rid of a lot of the disolved air (all those little bubbles on the way to boiling).

Probably better if you don't expose the water to air after heating it until it is frozen.