[pbhjpbhj]

>I'm sure Google could instead find an additional 10 female programmers for $100k each - thus changing the averages without having to overpay this one employee.

Eh? This is really sad - do Google really have to choose candidates that aren't the best in order to keep a particular balance of sexes. Is that company wide, department wide, etc..

I'd have thought a progressive company, like Google appear to be, would employ the best person for the job and do away with irrelevant discrimination.

[mdda]

Agreed - that's why I'm not buying the idea that the gender of the employee had anything to do with the amount of the pay.