Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by vanderZwan 2667 days ago
You can coat it - sunglasses are, for example. The coating can be invisible to the naked eye too, I think.

This is one of those situations where I think government intervention is needed. I bet the long-term benefits of coating glass like this are very real - both for society and individually (especially in professions that involve a lot of driving time). However, the short-term economic incentives work against it - there is probably a strong first-move disadvantage. Also, what is the economic benefit to a landlord to have UV-proofed glass for their tenants?

But if government were to implement a policy of requiring glass in cars and buildings to be coated like that? That levels the playing field. I doubt it is going to happen any time soon though.

But of we were ever going to to do that, I know for a fact that are also coatings with reflective layers (invisible to us) that tell birds that the glass is there, which would also save a lot of wildlife.

3 comments

I think you're inverting what parent is saying. Glass by nature seems to block UVB.
Ah, right. I somehow thought GP suggested near the end that it seems to be hard to fabricate glass that blocks UVA, and answered the question of how to deal with that.
How does coating it prevent the glass itself absorbing UVB?
As Waterluvian pointed out, I misread GP and explained how we could make glass block UVA as well.
Ah, yes the classic "government intervention to attack a misunderstood problem with a solution that won't work".
Ah yes, the classic "I just assert that governments can only intervene with wrong solutions, without in any way engaging with the topic at hand and actually arguing why it is a wrong solution."
Well it’s a wrong solution since glass already filters it. Seems a bit premature to salivate over regulation for something that isn’t a problem.
Did you read the other comments? I misread GP and the coating I talked about is for UVA radiation.