|
|
|
|
|
|
by TomVDB
2674 days ago
|
|
|
Having to go back 15 years for an example is usually a good predictor of the strength (or better: weakness) of an argument. The numbering has been very logical for more than a decade: you have a product generation, and increasing numbers mean increased performance. What is so nonsensical about that? |
|
|