|
|
|
Ask HN: Elevation Something to Consider When Deciding Where to Live?
|
|
4 points
by shiny
2676 days ago
|
|
After reading about how CO2 build up in offices can contribute to lower cognitive performance [1], when considering places to live, I automatically discount elevated places, like Denver, due to fearing similar cognitive degrading effects of having less available oxygen. This is compounded by anecdotes, like TJ Dillashaw moving closer to sea level due to reduced recovery ability when training in Denver [2]. We know that Tibetans have genetic adaptions to living at high altitudes [3], suggesting it's less than ideal for "ordinary" people to live that high. The question is whether it's also less-than-ideal to live even 2k feet above sea level and it's just a matter of severity? In other words, will a human (let’s say a programmer) living at sea level perform the same as a “fully adapted” person living at 2,200 feet (all else equal)? Thank you. [1]: https://medium.com/@dhh/air-quality-matters-but-dont-trust-foobot-on-it-e2df4234a776 [2]: https://youtu.be/BB7tpgwvg1g?t=4110 [3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-altitude_adaptation_in_humans#Tibetans_2 |
|
1. detrimental effects of too much CO2
2. detrimental effects of too little O2
The short and long-term effects of both may be very different. The human body can adapt to the low O2 at high altitudes given enough time[0], but I don't know if the same applies to high levels of CO2.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altitude_sickness#Prevention