|
|
|
|
|
by schoen
2680 days ago
|
|
In the second case, couldn't Louis Vuitton also host the associated records itself? There are several concepts related to this in other areas: provenance, catalogues raisonnés, serial numbers, title registries, pedigree registries, among others. People who make or who deal in rare or expensive things often adopt some of these mechanisms to help answer questions like: which one is this? is it genuine? who owns it? who used to own it? is it stolen? (There are lots of different threats, but some of these mechanisms help respond to each. Properly identifying and authenticating an individual object may be the hardest problem of all here—but that's potentially less of a database issue than the others.) |
|
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/20/arts/design/art-scholars-...
And works with supposedly excellent provenance still end up being repudiated by authentication committees:
https://www.antiquestradegazette.com/news/2011/double-denied...
Due to the misaligned incentives in the art authentication world, I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that a blockchain would be a good way of tracking records in the artworld, particularly if artists register works directly on it.