|
|
|
|
|
by Longwelwind
2716 days ago
|
|
If I have this: <div v-for="item in items">
<span>...</span>
</div>
The refactoring tools must know that the "items" inside the "v-for" refers to a property of the data object. In other words, the content of the data bindings is a totally new language by itself (the content of v-for has its own syntax, with a parser).Compared to the equivalent in React, which would be: {this.items.map(i => (
<span>...</span>
)}
Or possibly let elements = [];
for (item in this.items) {
elements = <span>...</span>
}
It's way easier for a refactoring tool to support JSX since it's just syntactic sugar over JS. If you were the developer of such a tool, you would just need to consider "<>" as values and possibly consider anything inside "{}" as normal Javascript.And indeed, as pointed by another commenter, React supports classes and integrates very well with Typescript since React 16. |
|