|
|
|
|
|
|
by simple_phrases
2676 days ago
|
|
|
Weird, I don't see any curiosity in your posts, just emotional reactions to mine. You're also confusing healthy skepticism with lack of curiosity, almost as if you're jumping to the defense of something you made an emotional investment in without consulting rationality. |
|
|
Curiosity as to what? The cynical content of your mind?
> just emotional reactions to mine.
Respond to my words, not your imaginations of what I'm feeling.
> You're also confusing healthy skepticism with lack of curiosity,
First of all, yours is a knee-jerk rejection of someone's report of recovering their health. It is unhealthy cynicism, and not even remotely healthy. It is just as well I did not have you advising me, all those years ago, when coming across the likes of Peterson and meatheals.com before proceeding with curiosity to heal my own chronic condition of 4 years, eh? Otherwise this conversation would not be happening.
> almost as if you're jumping to the defense of something you made an emotional investment in without consulting rationality.
Look, factual reports are there to establish a prima-facie case worthy of further investigation (sign of curiosity) – rather than capricious dismissal like yours (sign of cynicism) – and thus find out what it is on about. It is called being sensible. Maybe this is how your mind words, but neither emotional investment nor the counteracting rationality (which ironically tends to be emotion-influenced) is required.
You need to have an emotional investment to be cynical.