> The Bill of Rights consists largely of structural constraints that limit the power of the federal government
> The text of the First Amendment does not limit its applicability based on either territory or citizenship
> The original understanding of the Bill of Rights does not set territorial or citizenship status limitations on its applicability
> Under the Establishment Clause [doesn't apply to freedom of speech, but the other arguments do] of the First Amendment, the proclamation is unconstitutional and void even as to foreign nationals abroad
Can you explain why you think it's a good idea to be so vocally opinionated on a factual issue you're obviously not familiar with?
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/17/17-965/41835/20180...
> The Bill of Rights consists largely of structural constraints that limit the power of the federal government
> The text of the First Amendment does not limit its applicability based on either territory or citizenship
> The original understanding of the Bill of Rights does not set territorial or citizenship status limitations on its applicability
> Under the Establishment Clause [doesn't apply to freedom of speech, but the other arguments do] of the First Amendment, the proclamation is unconstitutional and void even as to foreign nationals abroad
Can you explain why you think it's a good idea to be so vocally opinionated on a factual issue you're obviously not familiar with?