|
|
|
|
|
by mlucy
2685 days ago
|
|
I hadn't read it before! That's a fascinating result, actually. They emphasize interpretability in the paper, but I find it more interesting that you can do so well with only local information. My first thought is that it makes sense that averaging together a bunch of local predictions would work well on the ImageNet task, since the different classes tend to have obviously different local textures, and class-relevant information makes up a large part of the image. I would be very curious to see if the technique is as competitive for other tasks. |
|