Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by menacingly 2684 days ago
I assumed the infuriating ambiguity is intentional, in order to train some algorithm they need to know what the prevailing human correct judgement is in dicey situations
1 comments

I don't think it's intentional -- it probably just emerges from the training process.

I'm guessing they do something like load up a batch of images and once N people agree on one, record the answer and remove it from the rotation. You end up left with the ambiguous images where people couldn't agree.

Then why do I keep seeing the same g-damn FIRE HYDRANT! :)