|
|
|
|
|
|
by leshow
2682 days ago
|
|
|
> And yes, sequential Go _is_ memory safe, but concurrent Go is not. You're agreeing with me, I was saying that Go isn't memory safe by Rusts definition. As you mentioned, it doesn't protect against data races, therefore, when Go claims memory safety they are using some different definition of memory safe. |
|
|