Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by seanwilson 2690 days ago
Anyone else hold back on releasing side projects because having to do data migrations with stored user data prevents you from being able to aggressively refactoring your code? Is there a good compromise for this?
1 comments

If the side project is "small", then the migration can be done in a few hours tops, so user impact is probably negligible. Have you encountered a more severe problem maybe?
I just meant I notice I feel a lot less freedom after initial release. When I haven't released something yet, I can wipe and recreate the database at any time, move, rename etc. as I want to try things out. Once I've released though, changes become significantly more painful and risky. Perhaps a migration is a few hours tops but that's compared to a few minutes tops when you don't have active users yet and when you're a solo developer each hour is a significant amount of your productivity.
> I just meant I notice I feel a lot less freedom after initial release.

Well, there's no arguing with that. And it usually doesn't matter if you have 2 or 200000 users, the migration has to be perfect - and automated - anyway :)