| > There is absolutely no Indian The Michelin Guide itself disagrees: “The Michelin Guide isn't in any of the Indian cities but that doesn't mean the red book is void of the subcontinent’s cuisine. In fact, Indian restaurants are listed in most of the territories with the Guide, some of which are in truly surprising cities. Tokyo for instance, is home to three Bib Gourmand rated Indian eateries, while the first Indian restaurant awarded with a Michelin star in Asia happens to be in Macau.” https://guide.michelin.com/hk/en/hong-kong-macau/travel/8-mi... Also: https://guide.michelin.com/us/san-francisco/indian-pakistani... Two 1-star, One “The Plate”, and Five “Bib Gourmand” in SF Bay. > South American Alex Atala’s D.O.M.in São Paolo is a two-star “contemporary Brazilian” restaurant, the first counterexample I could find. > Mediterranean https://guide.michelin.com/us/san-francisco/mourad/restauran... > Thai https://guide.michelin.com/us/san-francisco/kin-khao/restaur... EDIT: On review, you might have been referring to geography rather than cuisine, so we’ll do that again from that perspective to cover all bases. > Indian As noted above, geographically, that's correct > South American https://guide.michelin.com/br/rio-de-janeiro https://guide.michelin.com/br/sao-paulo > Mediterranean Also a valid point, geographically. > Thai https://guide.michelin.com/th/bangkok > Chinese https://guide.michelin.com/hk/hong-kong-macau https://guide.michelin.com/tw/taipei |
But hey, at least you got the til (~ diacritic) right. A lot of people don't even know that's a thing.