|
|
|
|
|
by nickbarnwell
2690 days ago
|
|
There is very limited evidence that the bilateral stimulation has _any_ impact on treatment outcomes [0]. EMDR is PE with a marketing machine behind it. To quote Robert Ursano, a prominent figure in trauma research and treatment at the VA, “I concur with the view that what's new about EMDR is not helpful and what's helpful is not new,"[1]. There is a disturbing trend of EMDR being billed as a panacea by commercial training institutes without educating clients about equally or more efficacious treatments (PE, CPT) that are studied primarily in academic centres. 0: Chemtob et al., (2000), Davidson and Parker (2001)
1: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/wellness/20... |
|
I have sent countless patients to therapists purporting to do DBT, CBT, PE, and others - only to review those sessions with them and hear about poorly delivered supportive therapy with questionable boundaries.
EMDR seems to be delivered with something approximating the actual therapeutic model as studied somewhere around 50% of the time. Which, sadly, is pretty good.