[FTA]

I try to follow the zipper rule when getting on the freeway. The problem I run into quite often in CA (and the thing that frustrates me the most in urban driving) is when people behind me on a highway on-ramp cut across the solid white line to "get ahead". That then forces me to have to slow down while they pass so I don't ram them from the side. If you factor in other through-way cars already in the lane, this can really congest merging and you get major backups in the rightmost lane.

A similar event comes to mind when you come across someone sitting in the left lane going under the speed limit but completely unaware or bother for the people passing them.

So I guess my point is, while these are great in theory, they don't really work in practice without buy in from the herd (I use herd as this problem can be framed in a similar light as vaccinations and herd immunity).

[ken]

Yes, this is one of those concepts which works much better for everyone, if everyone else drives like a German driver.

In the US, when you get to the end of the merge region, most people in the continuation lane will blast by at full speed, leaving no room to get over. I have to sit at the end of my lane, stopped, until I see a gap, and then floor it. That's worse for safety, fuel efficiency, wear and tear on my drivetrain, my own transportation time, and overall road throughput (everyone blocked behind me).

This is a "boil the oceans" type solution. All you have to do is convince everyone to do it.

Here, we can't even get people to stop blocking the box. The SPD is making short YouTube videos with "PRO TIPS" like "Bus lanes are for buses" [1] and "Don't stop in the street" [2]. The average driver is not at the point of thinking about higher level strategy like merge location yet.

[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_62iDA5Z-s [2]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3dUj6-Kx5k

[frosted-flakes]

Merging onto a freeway from an on-ramp is different, and zipper merge doesn't usually apply. There's a reason the merge zone is 300-500 metres long (where space permits), and depending on the region, clearly marked with a dashed line. It's up to you to match the speed of traffic, then signal your intention to merge before merging into a gap in traffic. Some on-ramps even have metering lights to space out incoming vehicles to make this process smooth. The only time other vehicles should have to change their speed is in heavy traffic, when a gap might not exist.

[ken]

> Merging onto a freeway from an on-ramp is different, and zipper merge doesn't usually apply.

I'm not talking about merging onto a freeway from an on-ramp. (I'm told the relevant law for on-ramp merging right-of-way varies by state, in the US.)

> The only time other vehicles should have to change their speed is in heavy traffic, when a gap might not exist.

Heavy traffic is the only time a zipper merge might be relevant in the first place, no? In light traffic, just get in the correct lane whenever you want. It doesn't affect anyone else no matter where you do it.

In fast heavy traffic (when drivers aren't leaving the requisite 4 seconds between cars), there's no reasonable gaps into which to merge. Signaling my intention doesn't change anyone else's behavior, and I don't have the guts to sneak my car into a 20' gap at 60mph. Even if I make it, if the driver in front taps the brakes even slightly, we're all going to have a real bad day.

This is a perfect example of how you can't just transplant one aspect of German driving, in isolation, to American highways. On the Autobahn, nobody's driving full speed for an extended length of time at only 1-1.5 car lengths behind the car in front of them. It's reasonable to say "just merge into the gap" because they leave a gap to merge into.

[merb]

actually german highway's/motorway's don't have a zipper ruling for the acceleration lane. on a highway the highway/motorway traffic always has priority. https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u... (3)