|
|
|
|
|
by coldtea
2692 days ago
|
|
>It is productive and elegant, sure, but lacks in performance. Emerging are projects like Fastify, and hundreds alike. They all aim to provide what Express does, at a lower performance penalty. But that’s exactly what they are; a penalty. Not an improvement. They’re still strictly limited to what Node.js can provide, and that’s not much as compared to the competition The whole article is badly written. First it assumes that the lower performance is something insufferable -- when in most cases, and for most project, it doesn't matter at all. Then it fails to understand the important of developer pool, convenience, ecosystem, etc, as if JS and Node could be willy nilly replaced by Golang for every project. Third, it pisses (as above) on Node web framework projects, just because Node.js has a performance top (as a single process lower than Golang. Also the importance of the overall architecture for performance is not accounted at all -- or the fact that as long as you add some database queries the speed benefit over Node diminishes... |
|