[chesser]

> The half a million users validates their techniques,

Let me introduce you to my friend, GeoCities.

Funny thing about free hosting.

> no matter how much armchair quarterbacking.

Transactions aren't armchair quarterbacking. Binary backups aren't armchair quarterbacking. Separating development from production isn't armchair quarterbacking. Kindly, you have no idea what you're talking about.

You can't give them credit for the repositories being mostly intact, when the ONLY parts that broke were the parts they mucked with to tie them into their database.

> but the reality of startups is that it very much is a race and features, for availability or recovery

And those are exactly the places where they screwed up.

[risotto]

Are you sitting in a chair? Do you not work at Github? Then you're armchair quarterbacking. We all are. Even if you are a quarterback for another team (I'm a DBA myself)

Anyway, it's a great discussion so we can learn from other peoples mistakes. I will be triple checking my restores later today, and likely halt the project I'm working on to get cold standbys shored up asap. (but it's hard to prioritize house keeping over customer centric features in the race I'm running along side the Github crew)

[chesser]

"a pejorative modifier to refer to a person who experiences something vicariously rather than first-hand, or to a casual critic who lacks practical experience"

Ironically the most fitting application would be to say that they're armchair quarterbacking their own database administering.

[burgerbrain]

Unless you work for github, you lack practical experience in github's internal operation.

[chesser]

Fortunately, there is this thing called "science" which means we can understand things about the world regardless of where we live. As Dawkins would say, there is no such thing as "Chinese Science" or "French Science", just science. Similarly, there is no such thing as "Github MySQL" or "Github separation of production and development systems" in that same sense.

These are categorical mistakes.