|
|
|
|
|
by qjighap
2691 days ago
|
|
You could make a case for everyone being bumbling and third-rate today. Post an edge case and have a lack of information to counter. I think by not addressing concerns head on gov't agencies are inviting for this type of behavior. I don't agree that stating that you have white labs as a defense for possibly tainted equipment is a full answer. I assume there is more coming since having a white lab test of equipment would be unreasonable for every piece of equipment due to workload. Not testing every piece of equipment to be used isn't a solution either since if Huawei is "evil" then they will just taint the box going to the correct provider. While I don't agree with this approach I can see why it happens. For example I have a smattering of news articles to prove incompetency.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/nwt-health-data-breach-...
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/forget-spy-case-where-s-brief...
and a bunch of professionals in what amount to a twitter war. If the Canadian government doesn't want people talking negatively about them then there needs to be more transparency. Not to the level of risking a breach, but something along the lines of a list of safeguards they are implementing. I wouldn't ever consider one safeguard a solution. If somebody feels the need to call out where the information is, I would legitimately like to read it. |
|