|
|
|
|
|
by g3houdini
2698 days ago
|
|
Let's assume I agree with you. Are you stating that the movie EB (and the woman Erin Brockovich) was responsible for making Hexavalent Chromium 6 the fall guy and that there was nothing that happened in Hinkley to the very tiny population of 2k (or less) people? |
|
If there is no statistically significantly higher rate of death due to diseases which could have been caused by C-VI that was drunk or eaten by residents, then I would pretty much stop there; my current belief is this is the case.
Now, if there was such a higher rate (which IIUC has never been established), and those rates were highly consistent with C-VI toxicity, and C-VI in consumed form was toxic, then I think you'd be on to something.
I think it was actually a mistake by EB herself, combined with PG&E's legal ineptitude, that led to the situation we are in. The movie just amplified the problem.
Note that I live near a few superfund sites where irresponsible local industry (thanks Intel and Fairchild!) caused leakage of TCE into the groundwater, which then plumed, and is causing a very expensive long-term cleanup. TCE groundwater contamination is much more concerning, with huge amounts of high quality scientific evidence clearly supporting the danger, and it's right next to an extremely highly populated area (San Jose). So it's not like I'm some sort of industry cancer-denier; I just think this is a situation where people came up with a compelling narrative that was wrong, and it got popular.