|
|
|
|
|
by mikeash
2700 days ago
|
|
The other extreme is a scenario where insurers magically have perfect knowledge about your individual risk and insurance becomes completely pointless. You will not receive exactly what you pay. Some people will receive much more, and their payouts are subsidized by the others who receive much less. That is the nature of insurance. What's the difference between your question and "How would you like it if you had to pay just as much flood insurance as someone down the street whose house actually gets flooded next year?" The only difference is that you can't reliably predict things with that level of accuracy. Insurance companies and low-risk insurance buyers are both incentivized to predict individual risk profiles as accurately as possible, but this gradually drives the system towards uselessness. |
|