|
|
|
|
|
|
by cmiles74
2692 days ago
|
|
|
I agree that C# would be a better fit. In terms of this ruling, I don't think the language really matters. Re-implementing any API that is copyrighted will be a problem no matter what the language. In terms of re-implementing the language, I believe that C# is just as free as Rust in this regard; it can be done without fear of a lawsuit. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2009/07/micro... Java was also unique in that Sun was only charging licensing fees for mobile implementations, providing motivation for Google to build their own implementation of the language. With mobile devices being as high powered as they are, I don't think that model makes sense anymore. |
|
|