Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by youdontknowtho 2691 days ago
This has more to do with feelings about you and the perception of you as a "bad guy" than it does about the technical discussion.

I tend to agree with the idea that the choice of defaults belongs to the distro's. If the distro's are deferring to the upstream project on default settings for a critical system component then they need to be more thorough and validate what they are shipping.
1 comments
v_lisivka 2691 days ago
Maintaining of all these special cases requires lot of knowledge. If maintainer is responsible for just systemd package, then it's not a problem, but when number of packages per maintainer is measured in hundreds, maintainer will stick to defaults, unless users will complain loudly enough to sacrifice whole working day on the problem.
link
Redoubts 2691 days ago
> Maintaining of all these special cases requires lot of knowledge.

Distro maintainers need to have a lot of knowledge about their init system. There's no way out of that. It's probably something everyone should know a little about as well.

link
inferiorhuman 2690 days ago
> Distro maintainers need to have a lot of knowledge about their init system. There's no way out of that. It's probably something everyone should know a little about as well.

Then maybe the init system should be simpler and not attempt to ingratiate itself with UEFI or attempt to replace su, sudo, syslogd, netcat, resolvconf, etc.

link