|
|
|
|
|
by misframer
2696 days ago
|
|
>> Badger provides better performance than RocksDB, both in terms of reads and writes. > It's not that simple. It's never that simple. Yeah. The post that is linked[0] within that quote has a "Benchmarks" section, but it looks like they're either 100% reads or 100% writes. Most real workloads aren't like that. [0] https://blog.dgraph.io/post/badger/#benchmarks |
|