[Apocryphon]

Their feedback is desirable because again, they can help others build better unions. A 2.0 version, if you will.

[docker_up]

The people high up on the union food chain have no desire to fix a broken system. Just like any other system.

[Apocryphon]

That assumes that new unions cannot be created, which is like assuming that new startups cannot be created.

[maxk42]

You're assuming a new union would be immune to the same fate.

You can be as clever as you like but all systems are exploitable.

[Apocryphon]

I would expect a new union to design around some of the pitfalls that have affected unions past.

Your general attitude sounds defeatist and strange on a community that is all about improving from past mistakes and learning to build better systems by breaking existing ones.