|
|
|
|
|
by icey
5695 days ago
|
|
Collusion absolutely provides unfair advantages (which is why it's against the rules). Poker is a game of incomplete information. The more information you possess, the better your odds are of making the right decision. So, in the instance of 2 poker bots colluding on a table (the 4 suits are (c)lubs (d)iamonds (s)pades (h)earts): Bot 1 has Ac5h and discards pre-flop (no money spent)
Bot 2 has KcQc and calls.
Player 3 calls
Player 4 calls
All other players discard
The flop comes up: 5c 10c 9c
At this point, Bot 2 has an excellent hand (a King-high flush), but it doesn't have the best possible hand; it's vulnerable to a higher flush due to the Ace. However, the because bot 1 & 2 have colluded, it knows with 100% certainty that it has an unbeatable hand and can play accordingly.This is a pretty weak example, but it's the easiest I could think of without assuming any knowledge of poker. Having knowledge of cards that have been in play significantly increases a player's ability to make decisions in a way that give that player an unfair advantage. |
|
While your example is a good one, the bot actually doesn't have an unbeatable hand. Another player could have trips or 4/5 of a straight flush and hit a better hand (quads or a straight flush) on the turn/river. Or the board could pair twice and give someone a full house. Unlikely in any case, but not out of the realm of possibilities by any means.