|
|
|
|
|
by fedotovcorp
2704 days ago
|
|
Thanks for the references! The main issue isn't the support and maintenance of a such distributed network, but its integration with current solutions and avoiding centralized middleware services that will weaken the schema described in the documents. |
|
Running a permissioned blockchain is nontrivial. "Just fork XYZ and call it a day" doesn't quite describe the amount of work involved. There's read latency at scale. There's merging things to maintain vendor strings,
> but its integration with current solutions
- Verify issuee identity
- Update (domain/CN/subjectAltName, date) index
- Update cached cert and CRL bundles
- Propagate changes to all clients
> and avoiding centralized middleware services that will weaken the schema described in the documents.
Eventually, a CDN will look desireable. IPFS may fit the bill, IDK?