[apotheosis]

Meta-analyses aren't science, either. They're hardly more than commentary as it's very easy to interpret many studies in a particular way.

[james_s_tayler]

Out of curiosity how does one arrive at that cognitive veiwpoint? I can't seem to find my way there.

If we assume it's true for arguments sake then you can't read a meta-analysis of meta-analyses in order to reach that conclusion because such an act wouldn't be deemed a legitimate source of information...

So how do you get there? What's the path to seeing things from that specific angle?