Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by devereaux 2710 days ago
Good point. Maybe not 51.95, but 51.9 mm you can say if you eyeball the measure to be quite close to the mm mark, but not exactly there.

Repeat enough time and you can interpolate 51.9, which you wouldn't have been if you had thrown away the precise measurement even if the precision is within your measurement errors (of 1 mm here)

1 comments

Your smallest tick is 1mm, not 0.1mm. You can't measure to 51.9mm. So your measurement is 52mm.