[userbinator]

If it has no object-oriented features, then I don't think it deserves to be called a C++ interpreter at all, since that's basically the one feature everyone thinks of when they're asked to compare C and C++; from the description it looks more like a C-subset interpreter.

[goalexboxer]

From the point of end user yes, but the original JSCPP project allows custom classes and members to be available via include.