|
|
|
|
|
|
by djur
2711 days ago
|
|
|
Proto3 has features (discussed elsewhere in these comments, like oneOf) that aren't present in Go's type system. I'm not clear on why constraining it so it's more narrowly compatible with a particular implementing language is more modern. It would be useful to see an example of the workflow of using this tool compared with the equivalent workflow while using protoc. That would be a selling point, while "modern" is just a sticking point. |
|
|