| Looking at the wiki page [0], I can see the benefits of the move: > Better metrics overall > Public stats page updated automatically > Better knowledge of relative use of different variants > Insight into Fedora's use in short-lived test systems and temporary containers vs. longer-term installations but nothing evaluating how and whether the proposed solutions will achieve those things. With no method being perfect, I'm suprised that no one is calling for a quantitative evaluation of various ID collection schemes, and that there is defined "good enough" value, other than > We need better data than that. I'm not a Fedora maintainer, and I'm not maintaining any other software of such popularity, so I have to ask: why? I assume it's to allocate work better. At which point do the downsides outweigh that benefit? [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DNF_Better_Counting |