|
|
|
|
|
by voidpointer
2710 days ago
|
|
Somehow, the examples all sound more like a quality and/or testing issue. The workflow seems prone to people rebasing to a buggy state and at that point, in a non-trivial system, all bets are basically off. Basically I need to be able to have a "JTB" about a pull request having undergone enough review and testing before being merged on the master that it doesn't introduce such glaring regressions as cited in the examples.
If that cannot be ensured, I'm setting myself up for one goose chase after the other... |
|