|
|
|
|
Ask HN: Why Microsoft not contributed to Java language?
|
|
1 points
by wartakode
2718 days ago
|
|
|
I'm not Java expert, and only experienced with Java web (Spring) and some old-android app for 2 year. And I'm aware Microsoft have .NET as their managed language and not using JVM for their product, and the interesting point from .NET are, they have any equivalent part from Java counterpart (and some have similar name i.e syntax, API name). But I curious and don't understand why Microsoft prefer create new 'JVM' over contributed to JVM, as far I know there are OpenJDK which is open source. |
|
|
When the United States department of justice sued Microsoft for monopolistic and anticompetitive practices, it could initially find no witnesses, as all the cowardly CEO's were scared to testify against Microsoft for fear of Microsoft revoking their OEM licenses to pre-install Windows on their products; everyone was really scared of angering Bill Gates.
Scott McNealy, bless his heart, was the only CEO with the balls to testify as a witness and it was a crucial, condemning testimony: the department of justice and NetScape Communications Corporation won the day, in large part because of Scott McNealy's bravery to go against Bill Gates and Microsoft.