|
|
|
|
|
|
by maxklein
5701 days ago
|
|
|
'Communist tyranny' as you term it, is very different from systematic racism. I doubt that the attitude of 'they won't let us' is really without merit - just 20 years ago, MTV would not play music by black artists. Black America has come vey far, and is one of the most dominant cultural forces on the planet. That's for the peak of the society. The bottom of the society still has to deal with a lot of legacy problems, and attitudes like yours don't help the problem. I doubt that the majority of problems comes from a sense of entitlement, like you strangely enough, seem to believe. |
|
|
What? I'm not making value judgments.
This is absurdly simple. If people have reason to believe that their efforts will be in vain, then they make no effort. But it's worse than that with socio-economic groups. Some members come to rely on the group's official explanation for lack of success, in order to maintain self-dignity. Those members hold back the others in their group to the best of their ability, else the official defense of mediocrity be disproven.
A great example is the Irish Catholics in America. "No Irish Need Apply" signs? Never happened (in America). http://tigger.uic.edu/~rjensen/no-irish.htm The myth of The Other keeping them down was necessary for them as a group. Even up through the first half of the 20th century, they insisted they were being held down as the explanation for their much lower income levels relative to white Protestants. Then came 1960. JFK was elected. If one of your group can get elected president, there's no more need for excuses. Since 1960, Irish Catholics have grown more and more like white Protestants. Both have almost the exact same income distribution now. Catholic church attendance has plummeted since 1960, asymptotically approaching Protestant church attendance. The group stopped reaching for excuses, and things got better for them. Fast.