Correct. I think it’s relevant and counterintuitive that the lethal dose amount for table salt is as low as it is, while remaining an essential nutrient.
That should catch your attention. It should jump out at you, and if it doesn’t, you probably need to reexamine how you think about food.
And anyway, I didn’t single anything out. Point your finger somewhere else, after you read this entire thread.
I think you very clearly have it backwards. The article up for discussion singles out sugar, and I responded to someone else’s criticism of singling out sugar.
> it’s relevant and counterintuitive that the lethal dose amount for table salt is as low as it is, while remaining an essential nutrient
Relevant to what? And why are you describing it as if it’s strange? It takes 15 grams of iron to kill you and iron is essential. “Dose makes the poison” is neutral statement yet you’ve used it to somehow attach negative connotation when talking about salt.
My stance towards you is that you use lots of word to produce little meaning and some clear manipulations.
The article is about sugary drink corporations being manipulative to mislead the public on negative effects of sugar - why are you talking about salt?
That should catch your attention. It should jump out at you, and if it doesn’t, you probably need to reexamine how you think about food.
And anyway, I didn’t single anything out. Point your finger somewhere else, after you read this entire thread.
I think you very clearly have it backwards. The article up for discussion singles out sugar, and I responded to someone else’s criticism of singling out sugar.
So, where’s your stance against me now?