|
|
|
|
|
|
by eesmith
2720 days ago
|
|
|
From the article, "It was a “phantom reference” that had been created merely to illustrate Elsevier’s desired reference format." and "nearly 90% of the citations were for conference proceedings papers, and nearly two-thirds of these appeared in Procedia conference volumes, which are published by Elsevier." Thus, it is unlikely to be due to predatory publishing. |
|
|