|
|
|
|
|
by paulfurley
2718 days ago
|
|
I'm a user but no expert about keybase. As far as I can tell they've pivoted to taking on Slack & friends with zero-knowledge team-chat, but global. Good luck to them! We're not in a hurry to try and move people off Slack or GnuPG: teams have their existing services (Slack, G-suite) and other workflows like Thunderbird + Enigmail, git signing etc. We think complementing those existing flows is the way to go. The longer term vision is that your team can sign up to Fluidkeys, download it and it sets up everyone's email client, git, pass etc according to your team's configuration. Then it quietly keeps everyone's keys updated when people join and leave the team. (and we rotate encryption subkeys every month) Back to today: 0.3's sending secrets feature is a small diversion from that goal, but we hope a useful feature in its own right :) I'd love your feedback on the vision above! |
|
What? I'm pretty curious what gave you this impression, as I've always seen their chat app as an interesting use built on top of their encrypted file system work, but in no way their primary use-case or business.
We (and everyone else I know that uses Keybase) use it for passing around sensitive information, either through chat, their encrypted Git repos, encrypted messages plopped into emails, etc.
I think Fluidkeys is cool and all, but I definitely wouldn't switch off of Keybase for it, and I think you're doing yourself a disservice by pretending that Keybase is "just another chat app" now and not a direct competitor that also has secure communication built in.