|
|
|
|
|
by voidlogic
2726 days ago
|
|
>That would seem to incentivise staying below that threshold for a percentage of borrowers. That only makes sense if its not implemented like taxes are. For example if when you exceed 50k and your repayment rate for the first 10k of income past 50k is 2%, and you earn 59k, you would take home $58,820. Why would you not want to take home this extra income. Is of course is assuming it works like taxes in the US (which it probably does). The same kind of bad logic occurs in the US when people won't take a raise because they don't want to "jump tax brackets", but they don't realize you only pay the higher bracket rate on the income that was in that bracket! |
|
The repayment scheme is stupid.